Study Guide

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The course consists of video material, written material, assignments (both oral and written) in English and classroom/online classes dealing with current and past economic events.
Please note: Some assignments are individual, others can be completed with a partner. Finding a suitable partner beforehand is recommended

Learning materials and recommended literature

The material consists of news articles, videos, research papers plus material provided by the teacher

Content and scheduling

Please see course Canvas timetable

Further information for students

Please note: Some assignments are individual, others can be completed with a partner. Finding a suitable partner beforehand is recommended

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, approved/failed

Written report
Oral Presentation as a video
Exam on campus.
All part must be passed to pass the course. 40% of the exam required for pass.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Below 40% score in test
Written report plagiarised, too short, content inadequate
Oral presentation not delivered

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Test score 40-62%
Written report: basic content, grammar and spelling mistakes, little or no analysis
Oral presentation: shortish, content basic, delivery not fluent

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Test score 63-88%
Written report: good content, few mistakes, differentiates between opinions and facts, own analysis
Oral presentation: good length, good content, fluent delivery

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Test score 89-100%
Written report: excellent content, exhibits intimate knowledge of the topic, own analysis which concentrates on the essential factors of the case
Oral presentation: Engaging and confident delivery, excellent content, the speaker appears an expert on the topic.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The course consists of video material, written material, assignments (both oral and written) in English and classroom/online classes dealing with current and past economic events.
Please note: Some assignments are individual, others can be completed with a partner. Finding a suitable partner beforehand is recommended

Location and time

Online Zoom sessions & Lohja campus

Learning materials and recommended literature

The material consists of news articles, videos, research papers plus material provided by the teacher

Content and scheduling

Please see course Canvas timetable

Further information for students

Please note: Some assignments are individual, others can be completed with a partner. Finding a suitable partner beforehand is recommended

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, approved/failed

Written report
Oral Presentation as a video
Exam on campus.
All part must be passed to pass the course. 40% of the exam required for pass.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Below 40% score in test
Written report plagiarised, too short, content inadequate
Oral presentation not delivered

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Test score 40-62%
Written report: basic content, grammar and spelling mistakes, little or no analysis
Oral presentation: shortish, content basic, delivery not fluent

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Test score 63-88%
Written report: good content, few mistakes, differentiates between opinions and facts, own analysis
Oral presentation: good length, good content, fluent delivery

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Test score 89-100%
Written report: excellent content, exhibits intimate knowledge of the topic, own analysis which concentrates on the essential factors of the case
Oral presentation: Engaging and confident delivery, excellent content, the speaker appears an expert on the topic.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, approved/failed

Written report
Oral Presentation as a video
Exam on campus.
All part must be passed to pass the course. 40% of the exam required for pass.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Below 40% score in test
Written report plagiarised, too short, content inadequate
Oral presentation not delivered

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Test score 40-62%
Written report: basic content, grammar and spelling mistakes, little or no analysis
Oral presentation: shortish, content basic, delivery not fluent

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Test score 63-88%
Written report: good content, few mistakes, differentiates between opinions and facts, own analysis
Oral presentation: good length, good content, fluent delivery

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Test score 89-100%
Written report: excellent content, exhibits intimate knowledge of the topic, own analysis which concentrates on the essential factors of the case
Oral presentation: Engaging and confident delivery, excellent content, the speaker appears an expert on the topic.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Blended learning study unit (online and on-campus).

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

Detailed information can be found in Canvas.

Quote from the degree regulations section 18:

“Students must be present for the first contact teaching session, or they must notify the responsible teacher of their absence to confirm they intend to participate in studies, Alternatively, the teacher can specify a different manner for the student to confirm that they intend to participate in the studies. The completion of these measures can be required within a week of the studies having begun. The application of the aforementioned approach requires that the teacher notifies the students accepted to the study unit of the practice and that the practice is specifically mentioned in the study unit’s implementation plan.

If the student has a justified reason for not attending the first contact teaching session or for not notifying the teacher of their intention to be involved in studies in the manner required by the teacher, the student must contact the responsible teacher to agree on participation in the studies. Their registration for the study unit will be rejected, of the student does not notify the teacher of being absent from the first contact teaching session or the reason for their absence cannot be considered justified, Another student who is in line for the study unit can be selected in their place”.

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work

Content and scheduling

Once the student has completed the study unit she/he will have achieved the following objectives:

- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS

More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Blended learning study unit (online and on-campus).

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

Detailed information can be found in Canvas.

Quote from the degree regulations section 18:

“Students must be present for the first contact teaching session, or they must notify the responsible teacher of their absence to confirm they intend to participate in studies, Alternatively, the teacher can specify a different manner for the student to confirm that they intend to participate in the studies. The completion of these measures can be required within a week of the studies having begun. The application of the aforementioned approach requires that the teacher notifies the students accepted to the study unit of the practice and that the practice is specifically mentioned in the study unit’s implementation plan.

If the student has a justified reason for not attending the first contact teaching session or for not notifying the teacher of their intention to be involved in studies in the manner required by the teacher, the student must contact the responsible teacher to agree on participation in the studies. Their registration for the study unit will be rejected, of the student does not notify the teacher of being absent from the first contact teaching session or the reason for their absence cannot be considered justified, Another student who is in line for the study unit can be selected in their place”.

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work

Content and scheduling

Once the student has completed the study unit she/he will have achieved the following objectives:

- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS

More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Important dates

Please remember that first and last lessons are compulsory.

Students workload

One credit point equals 26,7h of work done in class as well as independently.

Content and scheduling

During this course we will proceed from individual to pair working skills, and demonstrate oral, written and cooperation skills in English.


In this study module we use for example the following working methods: independent writing & speaking and pair communication. There is also group work as students are required to demonstrate their communication skills.


The study unit will contain work on the following themes:


• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Building rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

CEFR A2

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 1 student is able to:
-use essential professional concepts when explaining various work practices and situations
-search for information in different sources
-report
-work under guidance using the skills and methods learned
-interact with customers and/or co-operation partners
-receive guidance
-work as a member of a team
-plan the progress of their work and use of time under guidance
-work safely and in accordance with the professional code of conduct
-follow the provided instructions and rules

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 3 student is able to:
-use professional concepts in a consistent manner when explaining various work practices and situations
-gather information and use their knowledge basis
-report in the agreed manner
-work using the skills and methods learned
-engage in professional interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and identify their needs
-take part in guidance and utilise it
-engage in goal-oriented work in a team
-plan and manage the progress of their work and use of time
-detect safety-related risks
-justify their actions in accordance with the professional code of conduct

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 5 student is able to:
-use professional concepts extensively
-compare and choose relevant information
-report and communicate in a professional manner
-work independently, using the skills and methods learned
-take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for -responding to their needs
-anticipate their need for guidance
-promote the team’s work and team spirit
-manage their time appropriately, completing the agreed tasks at the required quality level
-work responsibly, applying the skills and methods learned
-plan and evaluate their work, taking safety and/or ethical aspects into consideration

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Weekly classes on campus.

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Learning materials and recommended literature

The study unit material is available in Canvas and you will get access to it on Friday, 22nd September 2023 at the latest.

See also:
Bovée, C. & Thill, J. 2011. Excellence in business communication. 9th edition. London: Pearson.
Hartley, P. & Chatterton, P. 2015. Business communication: rethinking your professional practice for the post-digital age. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Mclean, S. 2015. Business communication for success. Washington, D.C.: Flat World Knowledge.
Munter, M. 2014. Guide to managerial communication: effective business writing and speaking. 10th edition. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

Detailed information can be found in Canvas.

Quote from the degree regulations section 18:

“Students must be present for the first contact teaching session, or they must notify the responsible teacher of their absence to confirm they intend to participate in studies, Alternatively, the teacher can specify a different manner for the student to confirm that they intend to participate in the studies. The completion of these measures can be required within a week of the studies having begun. The application of the aforementioned approach requires that the teacher notifies the students accepted to the study unit of the practice and that the practice is specifically mentioned in the study unit’s implementation plan.

If the student has a justified reason for not attending the first contact teaching session or for not notifying the teacher of their intention to be involved in studies in the manner required by the teacher, the student must contact the responsible teacher to agree on participation in the studies. Their registration for the study unit will be rejected, of the student does not notify the teacher of being absent from the first contact teaching session or the reason for their absence cannot be considered justified, Another student who is in line for the study unit can be selected in their place”.

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work

Content and scheduling

Once the student has completed the study unit she/he will have achieved the following objectives:

- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary and comprehension quizzes 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS

More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in submitting vocabulary and comprehension tasks nor in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students demonstrate an understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They can achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations, modify their communication style according to context and the requirements of the message, and manage interpersonal interactions with people from different backgrounds. Spoken fluency and range are sufficient to manage common professional situations. Writing shows satisfactory control of grammar and lexis for the production of standard business messages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students demonstrate a good understanding of the principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations with a degree of success and can adapt their communication style to suit the requirements of audience and context. Speech is fluent, with a high degree of grammatical and propositional control. Writing shows good control of grammar, lexis, and style in a range of texts for professional purposes.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students demonstrate an excellent understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to communicate clearly, concisely, and appropriately in a wide range of work-related situations and are effective in adapting both the style and content of a message to different audiences and in different contexts. Speech is very fluent, flexible, and easy to understand, with a high degree of grammatical control and propositional precision. Writing shows excellent control of grammar, lexis, and style in producing a variety of text types and genres.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Weekly classes on campus.

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Learning materials and recommended literature

The study unit material is available in Canvas and you will get access to it on Friday, 22nd September 2023 at the latest.

See also:
Bovée, C. & Thill, J. 2011. Excellence in business communication. 9th edition. London: Pearson.
Hartley, P. & Chatterton, P. 2015. Business communication: rethinking your professional practice for the post-digital age. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Mclean, S. 2015. Business communication for success. Washington, D.C.: Flat World Knowledge.
Munter, M. 2014. Guide to managerial communication: effective business writing and speaking. 10th edition. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

Detailed information can be found in Canvas.

Quote from the degree regulations section 18:

“Students must be present for the first contact teaching session, or they must notify the responsible teacher of their absence to confirm they intend to participate in studies, Alternatively, the teacher can specify a different manner for the student to confirm that they intend to participate in the studies. The completion of these measures can be required within a week of the studies having begun. The application of the aforementioned approach requires that the teacher notifies the students accepted to the study unit of the practice and that the practice is specifically mentioned in the study unit’s implementation plan.

If the student has a justified reason for not attending the first contact teaching session or for not notifying the teacher of their intention to be involved in studies in the manner required by the teacher, the student must contact the responsible teacher to agree on participation in the studies. Their registration for the study unit will be rejected, of the student does not notify the teacher of being absent from the first contact teaching session or the reason for their absence cannot be considered justified, Another student who is in line for the study unit can be selected in their place”.

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work

Content and scheduling

Once the student has completed the study unit she/he will have achieved the following objectives:

- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary and comprehension quizzes 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS

More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in submitting vocabulary and comprehension tasks nor in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students demonstrate an understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They can achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations, modify their communication style according to context and the requirements of the message, and manage interpersonal interactions with people from different backgrounds. Spoken fluency and range are sufficient to manage common professional situations. Writing shows satisfactory control of grammar and lexis for the production of standard business messages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students demonstrate a good understanding of the principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations with a degree of success and can adapt their communication style to suit the requirements of audience and context. Speech is fluent, with a high degree of grammatical and propositional control. Writing shows good control of grammar, lexis, and style in a range of texts for professional purposes.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students demonstrate an excellent understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to communicate clearly, concisely, and appropriately in a wide range of work-related situations and are effective in adapting both the style and content of a message to different audiences and in different contexts. Speech is very fluent, flexible, and easy to understand, with a high degree of grammatical control and propositional precision. Writing shows excellent control of grammar, lexis, and style in producing a variety of text types and genres.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Weekly classes on campus.

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

Detailed information can be found in Canvas.

Quote from the degree regulations section 18:

“Students must be present for the first contact teaching session, or they must notify the responsible teacher of their absence to confirm they intend to participate in studies, Alternatively, the teacher can specify a different manner for the student to confirm that they intend to participate in the studies. The completion of these measures can be required within a week of the studies having begun. The application of the aforementioned approach requires that the teacher notifies the students accepted to the study unit of the practice and that the practice is specifically mentioned in the study unit’s implementation plan.

If the student has a justified reason for not attending the first contact teaching session or for not notifying the teacher of their intention to be involved in studies in the manner required by the teacher, the student must contact the responsible teacher to agree on participation in the studies. Their registration for the study unit will be rejected, of the student does not notify the teacher of being absent from the first contact teaching session or the reason for their absence cannot be considered justified, Another student who is in line for the study unit can be selected in their place”.

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work

Content and scheduling

Once the student has completed the study unit she/he will have achieved the following objectives:

- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS

More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit runs both online and on campus and the structure is supported by a Canvas learning environment. The study unit entails scheduled meetings and counselling online and these will not be recorded. The study unit incorporates individual, pair and group work. The teacher gives students individual feedback on completed tasks. Some of the tasks may also require you to give peer feedback on another student's task.

The student needs to have passed the language proficiency test before enrolling to the study unit. If the student failed the test, they are to complete Valmentava englanti either prior to or simultaneously with completing the study unit. The student may also choose to acquire these skills in some other way.

More information available in student intranet at https://laureauas.sharepoint.com/sites/studentFin_opintojensuunnittelu/SitePages/Kielitestit.aspx

Learning materials and recommended literature

The study unit material is available in Canvas and you will get access to it on Monday, 28th August 2023 at the latest.

See also:
Bovée, C. & Thill, J. 2011. Excellence in business communication. 9th edition. London: Pearson.
Hartley, P. & Chatterton, P. 2015. Business communication: rethinking your professional practice for the post-digital age. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Mclean, S. 2015. Business communication for success. Washington, D.C.: Flat World Knowledge.
Munter, M. 2014. Guide to managerial communication: effective business writing and speaking. 10th edition. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

The student needs to be present in the first meeting to save their seat on the study unit. The student will be removed from the study unit if they fail to notify the teacher about their absence. The seat will be given to the next student in queue if the student fails to be present or notify about their absence.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary and comprehension exercises 20% (0-5)
Spoken communication assignments 40% (0-5)
Written communication assignments 40% (0-5)
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in the Canvas workspace.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in submitting vocabulary and comprehension tasks nor in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students demonstrate an understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They can achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations, modify their communication style according to context and the requirements of the message, and manage interpersonal interactions with people from different backgrounds. Spoken fluency and range are sufficient to manage common professional situations. Writing shows satisfactory control of grammar and lexis for the production of standard business messages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students demonstrate a good understanding of the principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations with a degree of success and can adapt their communication style to suit the requirements of audience and context. Speech is fluent, with a high degree of grammatical and propositional control. Writing shows good control of grammar, lexis, and style in a range of texts for professional purposes.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students demonstrate an excellent understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to communicate clearly, concisely, and appropriately in a wide range of work-related situations and are effective in adapting both the style and content of a message to different audiences and in different contexts. Speech is very fluent, flexible, and easy to understand, with a high degree of grammatical control and propositional precision. Writing shows excellent control of grammar, lexis, and style in producing a variety of text types and genres.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Important dates

Please remember that first and last lessons are compulsory.

Students workload

One credit point equals 26,7h of work done in class as well as independently.

Content and scheduling

During this course we will proceed from individual to pair working skills, and demonstrate oral, written and cooperation skills in English.


In this study module we use for example the following working methods: independent writing & speaking and pair communication. There is also group work as students are required to demonstrate their communication skills.


The study unit will contain work on the following themes:


• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Building rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

CEFR A2

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 1 student is able to:
-use essential professional concepts when explaining various work practices and situations
-search for information in different sources
-report
-work under guidance using the skills and methods learned
-interact with customers and/or co-operation partners
-receive guidance
-work as a member of a team
-plan the progress of their work and use of time under guidance
-work safely and in accordance with the professional code of conduct
-follow the provided instructions and rules

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 3 student is able to:
-use professional concepts in a consistent manner when explaining various work practices and situations
-gather information and use their knowledge basis
-report in the agreed manner
-work using the skills and methods learned
-engage in professional interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and identify their needs
-take part in guidance and utilise it
-engage in goal-oriented work in a team
-plan and manage the progress of their work and use of time
-detect safety-related risks
-justify their actions in accordance with the professional code of conduct

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively.
Grade 5 student is able to:
-use professional concepts extensively
-compare and choose relevant information
-report and communicate in a professional manner
-work independently, using the skills and methods learned
-take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for -responding to their needs
-anticipate their need for guidance
-promote the team’s work and team spirit
-manage their time appropriately, completing the agreed tasks at the required quality level
-work responsibly, applying the skills and methods learned
-plan and evaluate their work, taking safety and/or ethical aspects into consideration

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Important dates

Please remember that first and last lessons are compulsory.

Students workload

One credit point equals 26,7h of work done in class as well as independently.

Content and scheduling

During this course we will proceed from individual to pair working skills, and demonstrate oral, written and cooperation skills in English.


In this study module we use for example the following working methods: independent writing & speaking and pair communication. There is also group work as students are required to demonstrate their communication skills.


The study unit will contain work on the following themes:


• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Building rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

CEFR A2

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 1 student is able to:
-use essential professional concepts when explaining various work practices and situations
-search for information in different sources
-report
-work under guidance using the skills and methods learned
-interact with customers and/or co-operation partners
-receive guidance
-work as a member of a team
-plan the progress of their work and use of time under guidance
-work safely and in accordance with the professional code of conduct
-follow the provided instructions and rules

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 3 student is able to:
-use professional concepts in a consistent manner when explaining various work practices and situations
-gather information and use their knowledge basis
-report in the agreed manner
-work using the skills and methods learned
-engage in professional interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and identify their needs
-take part in guidance and utilise it
-engage in goal-oriented work in a team
-plan and manage the progress of their work and use of time
-detect safety-related risks
-justify their actions in accordance with the professional code of conduct

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively.
Grade 5 student is able to:
-use professional concepts extensively
-compare and choose relevant information
-report and communicate in a professional manner
-work independently, using the skills and methods learned
-take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for -responding to their needs
-anticipate their need for guidance
-promote the team’s work and team spirit
-manage their time appropriately, completing the agreed tasks at the required quality level
-work responsibly, applying the skills and methods learned
-plan and evaluate their work, taking safety and/or ethical aspects into consideration

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Important dates

Please remember that first and last lessons are compulsory.

Students workload

One credit point equals 26,7h of work done in class as well as independently.

Content and scheduling

During this course we will proceed from individual to pair working skills, and demonstrate oral, written and cooperation skills in English.


In this study module we use for example the following working methods: independent writing & speaking and pair communication. There is also group work as students are required to demonstrate their communication skills.


The study unit will contain work on the following themes:


• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Building rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

CEFR A2

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 1 student is able to:
-use essential professional concepts when explaining various work practices and situations
-search for information in different sources
-report
-work under guidance using the skills and methods learned
-interact with customers and/or co-operation partners
-receive guidance
-work as a member of a team
-plan the progress of their work and use of time under guidance
-work safely and in accordance with the professional code of conduct
-follow the provided instructions and rules

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 3 student is able to:
-use professional concepts in a consistent manner when explaining various work practices and situations
-gather information and use their knowledge basis
-report in the agreed manner
-work using the skills and methods learned
-engage in professional interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and identify their needs
-take part in guidance and utilise it
-engage in goal-oriented work in a team
-plan and manage the progress of their work and use of time
-detect safety-related risks
-justify their actions in accordance with the professional code of conduct

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively.
Grade 5 student is able to:
-use professional concepts extensively
-compare and choose relevant information
-report and communicate in a professional manner
-work independently, using the skills and methods learned
-take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for -responding to their needs
-anticipate their need for guidance
-promote the team’s work and team spirit
-manage their time appropriately, completing the agreed tasks at the required quality level
-work responsibly, applying the skills and methods learned
-plan and evaluate their work, taking safety and/or ethical aspects into consideration

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Zoom meetings, contact teaching and self-study

https://laurea.zoom.us/j/559530892
passcode: 357711

Senior lecturer, M.A. Mirja Villman
mirja.villman@laurea.fi

Location and time

Zoom meetings and contact teaching on Otaniemi campus

Learning materials and recommended literature

Eye for Business digital textbook, teacher´s own material in Canvas

Alternative completion methods of implementation

If/when recognition of previous studies written and oral exam, possibly an additional written assignment

Co-operation with working life and/or RDI

-

Important dates

According to the timetable

- first classes
- oral presentations
- exam

Forms of internationality

English-speaking world and culture

Students workload

Equals 5 credits of student´s work

Content and scheduling

On weeks

Further information for students

-

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

National evaluation guidelines used, discussed during the course, see also Canvas
Exam (fail-5), oral presentation (fail-5), written assignment (pass/fail)

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

National evaluation guidelines used

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Idem

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Idem

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Idem

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit runs online and does not require the student to be present on campus. The study unit entails scheduled meetings and counselling online and these will not be recorded. The study unit incorporates individual, pair and group work. The stud unit requires the student to be active and committed to interaction. The teacher gives students individual feedback on completed tasks. Some of the tasks may also require you to give peer feedback on another student's task.

The student needs to have passed the language proficiency test before enrolling to the study unit. If the student failed the test, they are to complete Valmentava englanti either prior to or simultaneously with completing the study unit. The student may also choose to acquire these skills in some other way.

More information available in student intranet:
https://laureauas.sharepoint.com/sites/studentFin_opintojensuunnittelu/SitePages/Kielitestit.aspx

Learning materials and recommended literature

The study unit material is available in Canvas and you will get access to it on Monday, 27th February at the latest.

See also:
Bovée, C. & Thill, J. 2011. Excellence in business communication. 9th edition. London: Pearson.
Hartley, P. & Chatterton, P. 2015. Business communication: rethinking your professional practice for the post-digital age. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Mclean, S. 2015. Business communication for success. Washington, D.C.: Flat World Knowledge.
Munter, M. 2014. Guide to managerial communication: effective business writing and speaking. 10th edition. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

The student needs to be present in the first meeting to save their seat on the study unit. The student will be removed from the study unit if they fail to notify the teacher about their absence. The seat will be given to the next student in queue if the student fails to be present or notify about their absence.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary and comprehension exercises in Canvas 20% (0-5)
Spoken communication assignments 40% (0-5)
Written communication assignments 40% (0-5)
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in the Canvas workspace.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in submitting vocabulary and comprehension tasks nor in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students demonstrate an understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They can achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations, modify their communication style according to context and the requirements of the message, and manage interpersonal interactions with people from different backgrounds. Spoken fluency and range are sufficient to manage common professional situations. Writing shows satisfactory control of grammar and lexis for the production of standard business messages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students demonstrate a good understanding of the principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations with a degree of success and can adapt their communication style to suit the requirements of audience and context. Speech is fluent, with a high degree of grammatical and propositional control. Writing shows good control of grammar, lexis, and style in a range of texts for professional purposes.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students demonstrate an excellent understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to communicate clearly, concisely, and appropriately in a wide range of work-related situations and are effective in adapting both the style and content of a message to different audiences and in different contexts. Speech is very fluent, flexible, and easy to understand, with a high degree of grammatical control and propositional precision. Writing shows excellent control of grammar, lexis, and style in producing a variety of text types and genres.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Blended learning study unit (online and on-campus).

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

Detailed information can be found in Canvas.

Quote from the degree regulations section 18:

“Students must be present for the first contact teaching session, or they must notify the responsible teacher of their absence to confirm they intend to participate in studies, Alternatively, the teacher can specify a different manner for the student to confirm that they intend to participate in the studies. The completion of these measures can be required within a week of the studies having begun. The application of the aforementioned approach requires that the teacher notifies the students accepted to the study unit of the practice and that the practice is specifically mentioned in the study unit’s implementation plan.

If the student has a justified reason for not attending the first contact teaching session or for not notifying the teacher of their intention to be involved in studies in the manner required by the teacher, the student must contact the responsible teacher to agree on participation in the studies. Their registration for the study unit will be rejected, of the student does not notify the teacher of being absent from the first contact teaching session or the reason for their absence cannot be considered justified, Another student who is in line for the study unit can be selected in their place”.

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work

Content and scheduling

Once the student has completed the study unit she/he will have achieved the following objectives:

- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS

More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Weekly classes on campus.

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

Detailed information can be found in Canvas.

Quote from the degree regulations section 18:

“Students must be present for the first contact teaching session, or they must notify the responsible teacher of their absence to confirm they intend to participate in studies, Alternatively, the teacher can specify a different manner for the student to confirm that they intend to participate in the studies. The completion of these measures can be required within a week of the studies having begun. The application of the aforementioned approach requires that the teacher notifies the students accepted to the study unit of the practice and that the practice is specifically mentioned in the study unit’s implementation plan.

If the student has a justified reason for not attending the first contact teaching session or for not notifying the teacher of their intention to be involved in studies in the manner required by the teacher, the student must contact the responsible teacher to agree on participation in the studies. Their registration for the study unit will be rejected, of the student does not notify the teacher of being absent from the first contact teaching session or the reason for their absence cannot be considered justified, Another student who is in line for the study unit can be selected in their place”.

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work

Content and scheduling

Once the student has completed the study unit she/he will have achieved the following objectives:

- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS

More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit runs both online and on campus and the structure is supported by a Canvas learning environment. The study unit entails scheduled meetings and counselling online and these will not be recorded. The study unit incorporates individual, pair and group work. The teacher gives students individual feedback on completed tasks. Some of the tasks may also require you to give peer feedback on another student's task.

The student needs to have passed the language proficiency test before enrolling to the study unit. If the student failed the test, they are to complete Valmentava englanti either prior to or simultaneously with completing the study unit. The student may also choose to acquire these skills in some other way.

More information available in student intranet at https://laureauas.sharepoint.com/sites/studentFin_opintojensuunnittelu/SitePages/Kielitestit.aspx

Learning materials and recommended literature

The study unit material is available in Canvas and you will get access to it on Friday, 3rd February at the latest.

See also:
Bovée, C. & Thill, J. 2011. Excellence in business communication. 9th edition. London: Pearson.
Hartley, P. & Chatterton, P. 2015. Business communication: rethinking your professional practice for the post-digital age. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Mclean, S. 2015. Business communication for success. Washington, D.C.: Flat World Knowledge.
Munter, M. 2014. Guide to managerial communication: effective business writing and speaking. 10th edition. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

The student needs to be present in the first meeting to save their seat on the study unit. The student will be removed from the study unit if they fail to notify the teacher about their absence. The seat will be given to the next student in queue if the student fails to be present or notify about their absence.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Business vocabulary mind map 20% (0-5)
Spoken communication assignments 40% (0-5)
Written communication assignments 40% (0-5)
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in the Canvas workspace.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in submitting vocabulary and comprehension tasks nor in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students demonstrate an understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They can achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations, modify their communication style according to context and the requirements of the message, and manage interpersonal interactions with people from different backgrounds. Spoken fluency and range are sufficient to manage common professional situations. Writing shows satisfactory control of grammar and lexis for the production of standard business messages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students demonstrate a good understanding of the principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations with a degree of success and can adapt their communication style to suit the requirements of audience and context. Speech is fluent, with a high degree of grammatical and propositional control. Writing shows good control of grammar, lexis, and style in a range of texts for professional purposes.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students demonstrate an excellent understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to communicate clearly, concisely, and appropriately in a wide range of work-related situations and are effective in adapting both the style and content of a message to different audiences and in different contexts. Speech is very fluent, flexible, and easy to understand, with a high degree of grammatical control and propositional precision. Writing shows excellent control of grammar, lexis, and style in producing a variety of text types and genres.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit runs both online and on campus and the structure is supported by a Canvas learning environment. The study unit entails scheduled meetings and counselling online and these will not be recorded. The study unit incorporates individual, pair and group work. The teacher gives students individual feedback on completed tasks. Some of the tasks may also require you to give peer feedback on another student's task.

The student needs to have passed the language proficiency test before enrolling to the study unit. If the student failed the test, they are to complete Valmentava englanti either prior to or simultaneously with completing the study unit. The student may also choose to acquire these skills in some other way.

More information available in student intranet at https://laureauas.sharepoint.com/sites/studentFin_opintojensuunnittelu/SitePages/Kielitestit.aspx

Learning materials and recommended literature

The study unit material is available in Canvas and you will get access to it on Friday, 3rd February at the latest.

See also:
Bovée, C. & Thill, J. 2011. Excellence in business communication. 9th edition. London: Pearson.
Hartley, P. & Chatterton, P. 2015. Business communication: rethinking your professional practice for the post-digital age. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
Mclean, S. 2015. Business communication for success. Washington, D.C.: Flat World Knowledge.
Munter, M. 2014. Guide to managerial communication: effective business writing and speaking. 10th edition. Boston: Prentice Hall.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

The student needs to be present in the first meeting to save their seat on the study unit. The student will be removed from the study unit if they fail to notify the teacher about their absence. The seat will be given to the next student in queue if the student fails to be present or notify about their absence.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Business vocabulary mind map 20% (0-5)
Spoken communication assignments 40% (0-5)
Written communication assignments 40% (0-5)
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in the Canvas workspace.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in submitting vocabulary and comprehension tasks nor in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students demonstrate an understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They can achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations, modify their communication style according to context and the requirements of the message, and manage interpersonal interactions with people from different backgrounds. Spoken fluency and range are sufficient to manage common professional situations. Writing shows satisfactory control of grammar and lexis for the production of standard business messages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students demonstrate a good understanding of the principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to achieve communication objectives in a range of work-related situations with a degree of success and can adapt their communication style to suit the requirements of audience and context. Speech is fluent, with a high degree of grammatical and propositional control. Writing shows good control of grammar, lexis, and style in a range of texts for professional purposes.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students demonstrate an excellent understanding of key principles of effective communication for professional purposes. They are able to communicate clearly, concisely, and appropriately in a wide range of work-related situations and are effective in adapting both the style and content of a message to different audiences and in different contexts. Speech is very fluent, flexible, and easy to understand, with a high degree of grammatical control and propositional precision. Writing shows excellent control of grammar, lexis, and style in producing a variety of text types and genres.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish. Compulsory attendance 70%

Learning materials and recommended literature

Canvas platform

Important dates

First lesson attendance is compulsory as well as the final presentation day.

Students workload

One study point equals 26,7h of work.

Content and scheduling

During the course we do individual, pair and team work as well as work with another team at the end of course.

Further information for students

Preliminary English test has to be attempted/ completed before the course.
Aim is level B2 in CEFR scales, equalling to grade 3.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Aiming to reach level B2, grade 3 (read more at https://laureauas.sharepoint.com/sites/studentFin_opintojensuunnittelu/SitePages/Ydinopintoihin-kuuluvat-englannin-ja-toisen-kotimaisen-kielen-opinnot.aspx )

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

CEFR A2

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 1 student is able to:
-use essential professional concepts when explaining various work practices and situations
-search for information in different sources
-report
-work under guidance using the skills and methods learned
-interact with customers and/or co-operation partners
-receive guidance
-work as a member of a team
-plan the progress of their work and use of time under guidance
-work safely and in accordance with the professional code of conduct
-follow the provided instructions and rules

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2-C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 3 student is able to:
-use professional concepts in a consistent manner when explaining various work practices and situations
-gather information and use their knowledge basis
-report in the agreed manner
-work using the skills and methods learned
-engage in professional interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and identify their needs
-take part in guidance and utilise it
-engage in goal-oriented work in a team
-plan and manage the progress of their work and use of time
-detect safety-related risks
-justify their actions in accordance with the professional code of conduct

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to level C2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively.
Grade 5 student is able to:
-use professional concepts extensively
-compare and choose relevant information
-report and communicate in a professional manner
-work independently, using the skills and methods learned
-take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for -responding to their needs
-anticipate their need for guidance
-promote the team’s work and team spirit
-manage their time appropriately, completing the agreed tasks at the required quality level
-work responsibly, applying the skills and methods learned
-plan and evaluate their work, taking safety and/or ethical aspects into consideration

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Blended learning study unit (online and on-campus).

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

Detailed information can be found in Canvas.

Quote from the degree regulations section 18:

“Students must be present for the first contact teaching session, or they must notify the responsible teacher of their absence to confirm they intend to participate in studies, Alternatively, the teacher can specify a different manner for the student to confirm that they intend to participate in the studies. The completion of these measures can be required within a week of the studies having begun. The application of the aforementioned approach requires that the teacher notifies the students accepted to the study unit of the practice and that the practice is specifically mentioned in the study unit’s implementation plan.

If the student has a justified reason for not attending the first contact teaching session or for not notifying the teacher of their intention to be involved in studies in the manner required by the teacher, the student must contact the responsible teacher to agree on participation in the studies. Their registration for the study unit will be rejected, of the student does not notify the teacher of being absent from the first contact teaching session or the reason for their absence cannot be considered justified, Another student who is in line for the study unit can be selected in their place”.

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work

Content and scheduling

Once the student has completed the study unit she/he will have achieved the following objectives:

- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS

More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

CEFR A2

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 1 student is able to:
-use essential professional concepts when explaining various work practices and situations
-search for information in different sources
-report
-work under guidance using the skills and methods learned
-interact with customers and/or co-operation partners
-receive guidance
-work as a member of a team
-plan the progress of their work and use of time under guidance
-work safely and in accordance with the professional code of conduct
-follow the provided instructions and rules

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 3 student is able to:
-use professional concepts in a consistent manner when explaining various work practices and situations
-gather information and use their knowledge basis
-report in the agreed manner
-work using the skills and methods learned
-engage in professional interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and identify their needs
-take part in guidance and utilise it
-engage in goal-oriented work in a team
-plan and manage the progress of their work and use of time
-detect safety-related risks
-justify their actions in accordance with the professional code of conduct

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to level C2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively.
Grade 5 student is able to:
-use professional concepts extensively
-compare and choose relevant information
-report and communicate in a professional manner
-work independently, using the skills and methods learned
-take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for -responding to their needs
-anticipate their need for guidance
-promote the team’s work and team spirit
-manage their time appropriately, completing the agreed tasks at the required quality level
-work responsibly, applying the skills and methods learned
-plan and evaluate their work, taking safety and/or ethical aspects into consideration

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The course consists of video material, written material, assignments (both oral and written) in English and classroom/online classes dealing with current and past economic events.
Please note: Some assignments are individual, others can be completed with a partner. Finding a suitable partner beforehand is recommended

Location and time

Online Zoom sessions & Lohja campus

Learning materials and recommended literature

The material consists of news articles, videos, research papers, PLC annual reports and financial data plus material provided by the teacher

Content and scheduling

Please see course Canvas timetable

Further information for students

Please note: Some assignments are individual, others can be completed with a partner. Finding a suitable partner beforehand is recommended

Grading scale

Approved/Failed

Evaluation criteria, approved/failed

Written report
Oral Presentation as a video
Exam on campus.
All part must be passed to pass the course. 40% of the exam required for pass.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Below 40% score in test
Written report plagiarised, too short, content inadequate
Oral presentation not delivered

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Test score 40-62%
Written report: basic content, grammar and spelling mistakes, little or no analysis
Oral presentation: shortish, content basic, delivery not fluent

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Test score 63-88%
Written report: good content, few mistakes, differentiates between opinions and facts, own analysis
Oral presentation: good length, good content, fluent delivery

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Test score 89-100%
Written report: excellent content, exhibits intimate knowledge of the topic, own analysis which concentrates on the essential factors of the case
Oral presentation: Engaging and confident delivery, excellent content, the speaker appears an expert on the topic.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Zoom meetings, contact teaching and self-study

https://laurea.zoom.us/j/559530892
passcode: 357711

Senior lecturer, M.A. Mirja Villman
mirja.villman@laurea.fi

Location and time

Zoom meetings and contact teaching on Otaniemi campus

Learning materials and recommended literature

Eye for Business digital textbook, teacher´s own material in Canvas

Alternative completion methods of implementation

If/when recognition of previous studies written and oral exam, possibly an additional written assignment

Co-operation with working life and/or RDI

-

Important dates

According to the timetable

- first classes: Mon 13 March at 10.00-12.00 big auditorium
- oral presentations: on video submitted to Canvas site by 14 May at 23.59
- exam: Mon 15 May at 16.00-18.00 big auditorium
- written assignment: submitted to Canvas site by Sun 21 May at 23.59

Forms of internationality

English-speaking world and culture

Students workload

Equals 5 credits of student´s work

Content and scheduling

On weeks

Further information for students

-

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

National evaluation guidelines used, discussed during the course, see also Canvas
Exam (fail-5), oral presentation (fail-5), written assignment (pass/fail)

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

National evaluation guidelines used

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Idem

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Idem

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Idem

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

CEFR A2

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 1 student is able to:
-use essential professional concepts when explaining various work practices and situations
-search for information in different sources
-report
-work under guidance using the skills and methods learned
-interact with customers and/or co-operation partners
-receive guidance
-work as a member of a team
-plan the progress of their work and use of time under guidance
-work safely and in accordance with the professional code of conduct
-follow the provided instructions and rules

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2-C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 3 student is able to:
-use professional concepts in a consistent manner when explaining various work practices and situations
-gather information and use their knowledge basis
-report in the agreed manner
-work using the skills and methods learned
-engage in professional interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and identify their needs
-take part in guidance and utilise it
-engage in goal-oriented work in a team
-plan and manage the progress of their work and use of time
-detect safety-related risks
-justify their actions in accordance with the professional code of conduct

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to level C2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively.
Grade 5 student is able to:
-use professional concepts extensively
-compare and choose relevant information
-report and communicate in a professional manner
-work independently, using the skills and methods learned
-take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for -responding to their needs
-anticipate their need for guidance
-promote the team’s work and team spirit
-manage their time appropriately, completing the agreed tasks at the required quality level
-work responsibly, applying the skills and methods learned
-plan and evaluate their work, taking safety and/or ethical aspects into consideration

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

CEFR A2

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 1 student is able to:
-use essential professional concepts when explaining various work practices and situations
-search for information in different sources
-report
-work under guidance using the skills and methods learned
-interact with customers and/or co-operation partners
-receive guidance
-work as a member of a team
-plan the progress of their work and use of time under guidance
-work safely and in accordance with the professional code of conduct
-follow the provided instructions and rules

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 3 student is able to:
-use professional concepts in a consistent manner when explaining various work practices and situations
-gather information and use their knowledge basis
-report in the agreed manner
-work using the skills and methods learned
-engage in professional interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and identify their needs
-take part in guidance and utilise it
-engage in goal-oriented work in a team
-plan and manage the progress of their work and use of time
-detect safety-related risks
-justify their actions in accordance with the professional code of conduct

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively.
Grade 5 student is able to:
-use professional concepts extensively
-compare and choose relevant information
-report and communicate in a professional manner
-work independently, using the skills and methods learned
-take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for -responding to their needs
-anticipate their need for guidance
-promote the team’s work and team spirit
-manage their time appropriately, completing the agreed tasks at the required quality level
-work responsibly, applying the skills and methods learned
-plan and evaluate their work, taking safety and/or ethical aspects into consideration

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

CEFR A2

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 1 student is able to:
-use essential professional concepts when explaining various work practices and situations
-search for information in different sources
-report
-work under guidance using the skills and methods learned
-interact with customers and/or co-operation partners
-receive guidance
-work as a member of a team
-plan the progress of their work and use of time under guidance
-work safely and in accordance with the professional code of conduct
-follow the provided instructions and rules

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.
We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively. Grade 3 student is able to:
-use professional concepts in a consistent manner when explaining various work practices and situations
-gather information and use their knowledge basis
-report in the agreed manner
-work using the skills and methods learned
-engage in professional interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and identify their needs
-take part in guidance and utilise it
-engage in goal-oriented work in a team
-plan and manage the progress of their work and use of time
-detect safety-related risks
-justify their actions in accordance with the professional code of conduct

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Please refer to the Laurea evaluation guidelines. Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

We also use the common Laurea UAS guideline skill levels in evaluation on framework level I. Within the requirement levels of the assessment framework, the required competence is described for levels H/1 (H = pass), 3 and 5. The competence acquired by students is assessed comprehensively.
Grade 5 student is able to:
-use professional concepts extensively
-compare and choose relevant information
-report and communicate in a professional manner
-work independently, using the skills and methods learned
-take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for -responding to their needs
-anticipate their need for guidance
-promote the team’s work and team spirit
-manage their time appropriately, completing the agreed tasks at the required quality level
-work responsibly, applying the skills and methods learned
-plan and evaluate their work, taking safety and/or ethical aspects into consideration

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Leppävaara campus, daytime, weekly contact sessions

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas. The Canvas workspace for this study unit will open up on 31st August at the latest.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 30 hours in class
105 hours of independent study

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Business vocabulary test 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Leppävaara campus, daytime, weekly contact sessions

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas. The Canvas workspace for this study unit will open up on 31st August at the latest.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 30 hours in class
105 hours of independent study

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit. The student can also acquire the required language proficiency in other ways.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Business vocabulary test 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

According to Laurea UAS's degree regulations, "All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position.

The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module.

The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The competence to be accredited must be in line with the learning outcomes of the degree programme’s curriculum. The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

Students should apply for the accreditation of prior competence at the beginning of their studies, so they can progress in their studies without interruption. However, students are entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence throughout their studies."

Important dates

Canvas will be opened on 24th August 2022 at the latest.
Some additional dates may be scheduled for small group meetings.

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 10 hours teaching
120 hours of independent study

Content and scheduling

A detailed schedule will be given in Canvas.

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test s/he needs to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Business vocabulary mind map 20%, 1 ECT
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in the Canvas workspace.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

Contact teaching, Zoom meetings and self-study

https://laurea.zoom.us/j/559530892
passcode: 357711

Senior lecturer, M.A. Mirja Villman
mirja.villman@laurea.fi

Location and time

Zoom meetings and contavt teaching on Otaniemi campus

Learning materials and recommended literature

Eye for Business digital textbook, teacher´s own material in Canvas

Alternative completion methods of implementation

If/when recognition of previous studies written and oral exam, possibly an additional written assignment

Co-operation with working life and/or RDI

-

Important dates

According to the timetable

- first classes on Tue 4 Oct at 13.00-14.30 in Zoom
- oral presentations on video, submitted on 4 Dec
- exam: first exam opportunity on Mon 12 Dec at 15.30-17.30 big auditorium, other dates and times on Canvas site

Forms of internationality

English-speaking world and culture

Students workload

Equals 5 credits of student´s work

Content and scheduling

On weeks 40-50

Further information for students

-

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

National evaluation guidelines used, discussed during the course, see also Canvas

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

National evaluation guidelines used

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Idem

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Idem

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Idem

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The course consists of video material, written material, assignments (both oral and written) in English and classroom/online classes dealing with current and past economic events.
Please note: Some assignments are individual, others can be completed with a partner. Finding a suitable partner beforehand is recommended

Location and time

Online Zoom sessions & Lohja campus

Learning materials and recommended literature

The material consists of news articles, videos, research papers, PLC annual reports and financial data plus material provided by the teacher

Content and scheduling

Please see course Canvas timetable

Further information for students

Please note: Some assignments are individual, others can be completed with a partner. Finding a suitable partner beforehand is recommended

Grading scale

Approved/Failed

Evaluation criteria, approved/failed

Written report
Oral Presentation as a video
Exam on campus.
All part must be passed to pass the course. 40% of the exam required for pass.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Below 40% score in test
Written report plagiarised, too short, content inadequate
Oral presentation not delivered

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Test score 40-62%
Written report: basic content, grammar and spelling mistakes, little or no analysis
Oral presentation: shortish, content basic, delivery not fluent

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Test score 63-88%
Written report: good content, few mistakes, differentiates between opinions and facts, own analysis
Oral presentation: good length, good content, fluent delivery

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Test score 89-100%
Written report: excellent content, exhibits intimate knowledge of the topic, own analysis which concentrates on the essential factors of the case
Oral presentation: Engaging and confident delivery, excellent content, the speaker appears an expert on the topic.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Leppävaara campus, blended learning students, guidance and classes according to students' schedule

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas, which will open up on Tuesday, 11th March 2022.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 10 hours in Zoom sessions
2 classes at the campus
120 hours of independent study

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test s/he needs to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well. The student will after completing R0170 Valmentava englanti take this study unit R0243-3099 Professional Communication in English instead of R0243-3077, which is taught earlier.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Business mind map 20%, 1 ECT
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in the Canvas workspace.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Online (Zoom and Canvas)

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas which will open on the first day of the study unit.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Important dates

In order to confirm your enrollment in the course, you need to attend the first lesson (March 2) or inform the teacher about your absence.

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 30 hours of teaching in Zoom
approx. 117 hours of independent study

Further information for students

Students need to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If students do not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously with this study unit or before taking this study unit.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Attendance is mandatory (70%) during the whole course.
The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary and comprehension tasks 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Student does not demonstrate adequate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The implementation plan is available in Finnish.

Grading scale

H-5

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Building rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Tikkurila campus, blended learning students, guidance and classes according to students' schedule +
Online (Zoom and Canvas)

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas which will open on the first day of the study unit.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Important dates

In order to confirm your enrollment in the course, you need to attend the first lesson (Feb 7) or inform the teacher about your absence.

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
4 sessions on campus
approx. 8 hours in Zoom sessions
approx. 117 hours of independent study

Further information for students

Students need to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If students do not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously with this study unit or before taking this study unit.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Attendance is mandatory (70%) during the whole course.
The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary and comprehension tasks 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Student does not demonstrate adequate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciation equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciation equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciation equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Leppävaara campus, blended learning students, guidance and classes according to students' schedule

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas, which will open up on Tuesday, 11th January 2022.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 10 hours in Zoom sessions
2 classes at the campus
120 hours of independent study

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test s/he needs to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Business mind map 20%, 1 ECT
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in the Canvas workspace.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Tikkurila campus, daytime, weekly contact sessions

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Important dates

In order to confirm your enrollment in the course, you need to attend the first lesson on Jan 25, or inform the teacher about your absence.

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 30 hours in class
approx. 105 hours of independent study

Further information for students

Students need to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If students do not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously with this study unit or before taking this study unit.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Attendance is mandatory (75%) during the whole course.
The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary and comprehension tasks 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Leppävaara campus, blended learning students, guidance and classes according to students' schedule

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas, which will open up on Tuesday, 11th January 2022.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 10 hours in Zoom sessions
2 classes at the campus
120 hours of independent study

Further information for students

The student needs to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If the student does not pass the language proficiency test s/he needs to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well. The student will after completing R0170 Valmentava englanti take the study unit R0243-3099 Professional Communication in English that will start on Thursday, 17th March 2022.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Business mind map 20%, 1 ECT
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in the Canvas workspace.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Leppävaara campus, daytime, weekly contact sessions

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas, which will open up on Tuesday, 11th January 2022.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 30 hours in class
105 hours of independent study

Further information for students

Students need to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If students do not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Business vocabulary test 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficency in producing spoken and written professional communciations.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Building rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Leppävaara campus, blended learning students, guidance and classes according to students' schedule +
Online (Zoom and Canvas)

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas which will open on the first day of the study unit.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Important dates

In order to confirm your enrollment in the course, you need to attend the first lesson (Jan 26) or inform the teacher about your absence.

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
3 sessions on campus
approx. 12 hours in Zoom sessions
approx. 117 hours of independent study

Further information for students

Students need to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If students do not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously with this study unit or before taking this study unit.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Attendance is mandatory (70%) during the whole course.
The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary and comprehension tasks 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Student does not demonstrate adequate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciation equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciation equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciation equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Leppävaara campus, daytime, weekly contact sessions

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas, which will open up on Tuesday, 11th January 2022.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 30 hours in class
105 hours of independent study

Further information for students

Students need to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If students do not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously or before taking this study unit.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The final grade is based on the following:
Business vocabulary test 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Students do not demonstrate adequate proficency in producing spoken and written professional communciations.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Buidling rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Online (Zoom and Canvas)

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas which will open on the first day of the study unit.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Important dates

In order to confirm your enrollment in the course, you need to attend the first lesson (Jan 20) or inform the teacher about your absence.

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
approx. 30 hours of teaching in Zoom
approx. 117 hours of independent study

Further information for students

Students need to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If students do not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously with this study unit or before taking this study unit.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Attendance is mandatory (70%) during the whole course.
The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary and comprehension tasks 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Student does not demonstrate adequate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciations equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The study unit will contain work on the following themes:
• Intercultural communication and communication style
• Communication strategies in spoken and written communication
• Building rapport in interpersonal communication
• Communicating effectively and persuasively in presentations, meetings and negotiations
• The use of style and register in spoken and written texts
• Review of common business terms

Location and time

Leppävaara campus, guidance and classes according to blended learning students' schedule +
Online (Canvas)

Learning materials and recommended literature

Learning materials in Canvas which will open on the first day of the study unit.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

By agreement with the lecturer

Important dates

In order to confirm your enrollment in the course, you need to attend the first lesson (15.1.) or inform the teacher about your absence.

Forms of internationality

Development of intercultural competences is integrated into the study unit

Students workload

5 ECTS = 135 hours of work
5 sessions on campus
approx. 120 hours of independent study

Further information for students

Students need to have passed the initial language proficiency test prior to taking this study unit. If students do not pass the language proficiency test they need to complete R0170 Valmentava englanti as well either simultaneously with this study unit or before taking this study unit.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Attendance is mandatory (70%) during the whole course.
The final grade is based on the following:
Vocabulary and comprehension tasks 20%, 1 ECTS
Spoken communication 40%, 2 ECTS
Written communication 40%, 2 ECTS
All parts must be passed in order to complete the study unit.
More detailed assessment criteria are given in Canvas.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Student does not demonstrate adequate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communications.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciation equivalent to at least level B1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciation equivalent to at least level B2 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Students should be able to demonstrate proficiency in producing spoken and written professional communciation equivalent to at least level C1 according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field-specific tasks and intercultural contexts
- produce effective spoken and written texts using an appropriate style and register
- demonstrate knowledge of essential terminology needed in working life
- apply principles of interpersonal and organizational communication

Teaching methods

The course consists of video material, written material, assignments (both oral and written) in English and classroom/online classes dealing with current and past economic events.
Please note: Some assignments are individual, others can be completed with a partner. Finding a suitable partner beforehand is recommended

Location and time

Online Zoom sessions & Lohja campus

Learning materials and recommended literature

The material consists of news articles, videos, research papers, PLC annual reports and financial data plus material provided by the teacher

Content and scheduling

Please see course Canvas timetable

Further information for students

Please note: Some assignments are individual, others can be completed with a partner. Finding a suitable partner beforehand is recommended

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation criteria, approved/failed

Written report
Oral Presentation as a video
Exam on campus.
All part must be passed to pass the course. 40% of the exam required for pass.

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Below 40% score in test
Written report plagiarised, too short, content inadequate
Oral presentation not delivered

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Test score 40-62%
Written report: basic content, grammar and spelling mistakes, little or no analysis
Oral presentation: shortish, content basic, delivery not fluent

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Test score 63-88%
Written report: good content, few mistakes, differentiates between opinions and facts, own analysis
Oral presentation: good length, good content, fluent delivery

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Test score 89-100%
Written report: excellent content, exhibits intimate knowledge of the topic, own analysis which concentrates on the essential factors of the case
Oral presentation: Engaging and confident delivery, excellent content, the speaker appears an expert on the topic.