Study Guide

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- explain the strategic shift to service-based business logic and its impact on corporate level
- analyse a company’s strategy and strategic choices
- master the key concepts, principles and methods of strategic management

Teaching methods

Lectures, group work, individual assignments

Learning materials and recommended literature

Lusch, Robert F. & Vargo, Stephen L. 2014. Service-Dominant Logic. Premises, Perspectives,
Possibilities. Cambridge University Press, UK.
Literature list will be published in Canvas.

Co-operation with working life and/or RDI

Each student may select the case company/organization for the course assignment him/herself.

Important dates

Based on the degree regulations (2024), the student accepted for the implementation is required to confirm his/her participation by showing activity at the start of the study in the following way:

In order to demonstrate activity, the student must be present at the first contact lesson or notify the teacher in charge of his/her absence to confirm his/her participation in the study. Registration will be rejected if the student does not report his/her absence at the start of the study or the reason for the absence cannot be considered justified. Another student can be taken in his place. The first contact lesson is 4 October 2024.

Forms of internationality

International student group

Students workload

5 ects credits = 135 hours (1 credit = 27 hours of work)
Contact sessions
Reading the literature for the assignments
Collaboration with the case company/organization
Writing the assignments (notes, reports)

Further information for students

It is compulsory to attend the contact sessions.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Assessment
- Pre assignment (individual/group assignment): fail/pass
- Literature analysis (individual assignment): 30%
- Focus of the development case (individual assignment): 10%
- Final development plan for strategic service innovation or business model in the case organizations (individual assignment): 60%
Oral presentations and activity in classes
- Thoroughness of the analysis presented
- Logical flow and clarity of presentations
- Comments and contribution to discussion during classes
- Presence and activeness
Reports
- Comprehensiveness of the theoretical foundation
- Logic, objectivity, thoroughness and motivation of the arguments and ideas presented in the literature analysis as well as in the final report
- Concreteness of the action plan provided in the final report
- Clarity of the written reports

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Grade 1 - Student is able
Knowledge base: To gather, process, produce and evaluate information widely. To use concepts of the area of expertise systematically.
Problem solving: To solve problems in research, development and/or innovation activities.
Development: To recognise and analyse focuses of development making use of the knowledge base.
Communication: To communicate clearly both orally and in writing.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Grade 3 - Student is able
Knowledge base: To gather, process, produce and evaluate information critically and widely making use of both national and international scientific sources. To use concepts of the area of expertise fairly.
Problem solving: To solve problems in research, development and/or innovation activities by applying and combining information from different fields.
Development: To create target-oriented, justified development plans considering the community.
Communication: To communicate in a competent, clear and consistent manner both orally and in writing.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Student is able
Knowledge base: To create a consistent framework/knowledge base making use of both national and international scientific sources in a critical analytic fashion.
Problem solving: To solve demanding problems in research, development and/or innovation activities where new knowledge and competence is created as well as to apply and combine information from different fields.
Development: To develop the activities of the competence area in a target-oriented and communal fashion.
Communication: To communicate convincingly both orally and in writing to audiences within and exterior to the field.

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- explain the strategic shift to service-based business logic and its impact on corporate level
- analyse a company’s strategy and strategic choices
- master the key concepts, principles and methods of strategic management

Teaching methods

Lectures, group work, individual assignments

Learning materials and recommended literature

Lusch, Robert F. & Vargo, Stephen L. 2014. Service-Dominant Logic. Premises, Perspectives,
Possibilities. Cambridge University Press, UK.
Literature list will be published in Canvas.

Co-operation with working life and/or RDI

Each student may select the case company/organization for the course assignment him/herself.

Forms of internationality

International student group

Students workload

5 ects credits = 135 hours (1 credit = 27 hours of work)
Contact sessions
Reading the literature for the assignments
Collaboration with the case company/organization
Writing the assignments (notes, reports)

Further information for students

It is compulsory to attend the contact sessions.

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Assessment
- Pre assignment (individual/group assignment): fail/pass
- Literature analysis (individual assignment): 30%
- Focus of the development case (individual assignment): 10%
- Final development plan for strategic service innovation or business model in the case organizations (individual assignment): 60%
Oral presentations and activity in classes
- Thoroughness of the analysis presented
- Logical flow and clarity of presentations
- Comments and contribution to discussion during classes
- Presence and activeness
Reports
- Comprehensiveness of the theoretical foundation
- Logic, objectivity, thoroughness and motivation of the arguments and ideas presented in the literature analysis as well as in the final report
- Concreteness of the action plan provided in the final report
- Clarity of the written reports

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Grade 1 - Student is able
Knowledge base: To gather, process, produce and evaluate information widely. To use concepts of the area of expertise systematically.
Problem solving: To solve problems in research, development and/or innovation activities.
Development: To recognise and analyse focuses of development making use of the knowledge base.
Communication: To communicate clearly both orally and in writing.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Grade 3 - Student is able
Knowledge base: To gather, process, produce and evaluate information critically and widely making use of both national and international scientific sources. To use concepts of the area of expertise fairly.
Problem solving: To solve problems in research, development and/or innovation activities by applying and combining information from different fields.
Development: To create target-oriented, justified development plans considering the community.
Communication: To communicate in a competent, clear and consistent manner both orally and in writing.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Student is able
Knowledge base: To create a consistent framework/knowledge base making use of both national and international scientific sources in a critical analytic fashion.
Problem solving: To solve demanding problems in research, development and/or innovation activities where new knowledge and competence is created as well as to apply and combine information from different fields.
Development: To develop the activities of the competence area in a target-oriented and communal fashion.
Communication: To communicate convincingly both orally and in writing to audiences within and exterior to the field.