Skip to main content

English in Social Services (5 cr)

Code: R0032-3047

General information


Enrollment

22.05.2023 - 17.09.2023

Timing

28.09.2023 - 30.11.2023

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Virtual proportion

5 op

Mode of delivery

Distance learning

Unit

Korkeakouluyksikkö D, Verkkokampus, sote

Campus

Laurea Virtual Campus

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Seats

20 - 40

Degree programmes

  • Sosionomikoulutus (SSD2), Laurea Verkkokampus

Teachers

  • Camilla Kåla
  • Henna Elo

Teacher in charge

Camilla Kåla

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field specific tasks
- speak and write English with the understanding of the appropriate style and register
- identify personal developmental needs in communication and language skills and develop realistic strategies for improvement
- search for information from professional publications and databases

Learning materials and recommended literature

Canvas: Separate material
You can also use the book Way to Welfare as a help (this is not obligatory)

Important dates

Zoom-link: https://laurea.zoom.us/j/6369619776
Oral exams- according to a separate schedule and instructions.
Written exam: Thursday November 30th, 13.00 PM-15.00 PM
Proctorio

Forms of internationality

The English-speaking world and culture

Students workload

1 credit =27 hours of studying
5 credits = 135 hours of studying

Content and scheduling

According to the schedule.
The themes for the module are, among other things:
- studying
- KELA + benefits
- social security in Finland
- child welfare
- day care + school
- social exclusion + substance abuse
- the elderly

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

The National evaluation criteria in use.
The course includes some obligatory assignments (pass/fail)
The evaluation is based on both oral and written skills (0-5).
Compulsory attendance in the course-lessons =75%. The lessons cannot be replaced by different assignments.
Your final grade is based on both written and oral skills, 50% from the written and 50% from the oral evaluation.

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Knows the basic field-specific vocabulary and can use it on a basic level, a lot of mistakes in the use of grammatical constructions.

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Can produce field-specific vocabulary and grammar works fairly well, but lapses and mistakes occur.

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Shows good mastery of field-specific terminology and can use even more demanding grammatical constructions.