Clinical Reasoning in Physiotherapy (5 op)
Toteutuksen tunnus: SP00BV65-3001
Toteutuksen perustiedot
- Ajoitus
-
01.08.2023 - 31.12.2023
Toteutus on päättynyt.
- Opintopistemäärä
- 5 op
- Lähiosuus
- 5 op
- Toteutustapa
- Lähiopetus
- Toimipiste
- Laurea Otaniemi
- Opetuskielet
- englanti
- Paikat
- 40 - 50
- Koulutus
- Degree Programme in Physiotherapy (SPG2), Laurea Otaniemi
- Opettajat
- Elina Jääskeläinen
- Mikko Harju
- Vastuuopettaja
- Elina Jääskeläinen
- Ryhmät
-
SPG222SN1Degree Programme in Physiotherapy, daytime studies, S22, Otaniemi, group 1
- Opintojakso
- SP00BV65
Tavoitteet
The student is able to:
- apply in a client-centred manner the information gained in the examination and assessment of the client’s functioning in clinical reasoning in physiotherapy
- draw up a physiotherapy diagnosis for the client
- apply creative problem solution when preparing the objectives and the plan for the physiotherapy process
- assess the client’s physiotherapy process and the decisions made by himself or herself in a critical manner.
Oppimateriaali ja suositeltava kirjallisuus
Higgs & Jones , 2008 "Clinical reasoning in Physiotherapy"
Cook, G., 2010 "Functional Movement Systems"
Luomajoki, H. 2018. Liikkeen ja liikekontrollin häiriöt. VK-kustannus.
In addition, other course material.
Toteutustapa
In the course, work is mainly done in workshops, practicing physical therapy support and the formation of the clinical reasoning process. 100% attendance at the workshops is required. Compensation for absences is agreed separately with the supervising teacher. In addition, it is good to reserve enough time for independent study during the Study Period.
The numerically evaluated portions of the Study Course are the exam and the seminar work. The exam material is distributed during the course's orientation session. The seminar work is carried out as group work.
Objectives of the course:
After the course, the student can:
- Obtain customer-oriented research information about the situation of his functional capacity and resources in the clinical reasoning of physiotherapy
- Forms a physiotherapeutic diagnosis of the client's situation
- Implements problem solving regarding the client's ability to function in connection with the physiotherapy process
- Critically evaluate the client's physiotherapy process and the conclusions they have made
Toteutuksen tärkeät päivämäärät
25.9. at 8.30-11 Orientation
5.10 at 8-11 Group A, at 11.45-14.45 Group B
12.10 at 8-11 Group B, at 11.45-14.45 Group A
19.10 at 8-11 Group B, at 11.45-14.45 Group A
24.10 at 8-11 Group A, at 11.45-14.45 Group B
2.11. at 8-11 Group A, at 11.45-14.45 Group B
9.11. at 8-11 Group A, at 11.45-14.45 Group B
16.11. at 8-11 Group B, at 11.45-14.45 Group A
20.11. Independent study
28.11. Exam
4.12. Seminar: at 8-11 Group B, at 11.45-14.45 Group A
According to the degree regulations (section 18) “students must be present in the first contact session or notify their teacher in charge if they cannot attend. If they fail to notify the teacher of their absence in the first contact session, their enrollment will be rejected. Another student in the queue may be enrolled in the study unit in the place of the absent student.” (Laurea degree regulations) In the case of online studies the lecturer can also specify some other way than participation on an online meeting what is required from the student so that he/she verifies his/her attendance on the study unit (Decision by the vice president, education 7/2019).
The exam is part of the course and you can retake the exam twice. Retake dates are:
1st retake: Dec 12th 2023
2nd retake: Jan 25th 2024
Kansainvälisyys toteutuksella
The study unit is suitable for exchange students.
Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat
All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position. The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module. The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.
Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus
One credit corresponds to an average of 26.7 hours of student work. In this course, the students' workload is therefore estimated to be around 135 hours, which includes workshop study, independent study for workshops and exams, basketball players' FMS measurements, and working on the final assignment with the group.
Arviointiasteikko
H-5
Lisätiedot
The study unit corresponds to the requirements of Bachelor's level education.
According to the degree regulations (section 18) "students must be present for the first contact teaching session, or they must notify the responsible teacher of their absence to confirm they intend to participate in studies, Alternatively, the teacher can specify a different manner for the student to confirm that they intend to participate in the studies. The completion of these measures can be required within a week of the studies having begun. The application of the aforementioned approach requires that the teacher notifies the students accepted to the study unit of the practice and that the practice is specifically mentioned in the study unit’s implementation plan.
If the student has a justified reason for not attending the first contact teaching session or for not notifying the teacher of their intention to be involved in studies in the manner required by the teacher, the student must contact the responsible teacher to agree on participation in the studies. Their registration for the study unit will be rejected, of the student does not notify the teacher of being absent from the first contact teaching session or the reason for their absence cannot be considered justified, Another student who is in line for the study unit can be selected in their place."