Siirry suoraan sisältöön

Ethical Leadership and Management Symposium (5 op)

Toteutuksen tunnus: SY00BN44-3001

Toteutuksen perustiedot


Ilmoittautumisaika

31.05.2019 - 31.07.2019

Ajoitus

01.08.2019 - 31.12.2019

Opintopistemäärä

5 op

Virtuaaliosuus

4 op

TKI-osuus

2 op

Toteutustapa

20 % Lähiopetus, 80 % Etäopetus

Yksikkö

Laurea-ammattikorkeakoulu

Toimipiste

Laurea Tikkurila

Opetuskielet

  • Englanti

Paikat

15 - 60

Koulutus

  • Laurea täydentävä osaaminen, yamk-tutkinto (TYJ), Yhteiset opinnot

Opettaja

  • Teija-Kaisa Aholaakko
  • Jorma Jokela

Ryhmät

  • TYJ19SJ
    Täydentävä osaaminen (yamk-tutkinto), S19, Yhteiset opinnot

Osaamistavoitteet

The student is able:
• to reflect and develop her/his identity and performance as an ethical leader
• to manage cross-cultural partnerships and working societies
• to lead ethically sustainable transitions in multiprofessional contexts
• to enhance ethical aspects in research and development
• to promote and guide ethical dialogue in working society

Toteutustapa

• Learning within Ethical Leadership and Management Symposium lectures and workshops
• Individual assignment: 1) pre-symposium research table 2) learning diary

Aika ja paikka

Deadline of the Pre-assignment 1: research table. 18th October 2019.
The return of the research table is a compulsory requirement for participation in the ELM Symposium. The late return of the table will serve as a sign of a low commitment and will decrease the final grade.

2019 October 24th 9-16 Attending to Ethical Leadership and Management –Symposium
at Laurea Tikkurila campus: Auditorium B101 (Ratatie 22, 01300 Vantaa)
2019 October 25th 9-16 Attending to Ethical Leadership and Management –Symposium
at Laurea Tikkurila campus: Auditorium B101 (Ratatie 22, 01300 Vantaa)

2019 November 24th 23:59. Deadline for learning diary.
2020 January 17th. Second deadline for the learning diaries.

Oppimateriaali ja suositeltava kirjallisuus

ALLEA - All European Academies. 2017. The European Code of Conduct for Research Intregrity. Revised Edition Berlin: All European Academies. https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf

Carroll, A.B. 1999. Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business and Society, 38(3) 268-295.

Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (Oviedo Convention), Council of Europe, 1997. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/164.htm Accessed 31st March 2017. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, Council of Europe (April 1997).
Council of Europe 2009. Bioethical Issues. Educational Fact Sheets. http://book.coe.int

Donaldson, T. & Werhane, P. H. 2002. Introduction to Ethical Reasoning. In: Donaldson, T., Werhane, P.H. & Cording, M. (eds.) Ethical Issues in Business. 7th edition, Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall. 1-11.

Donetto S., Pierri P., Tsianakas V. & Robert G. 2015 Experience-based Co-design and Healthcare Improvement: Realizing Participatory Design in the Public Sector, The Design Journal, 18(2), 227-24.





Heimo O.I., Harviainen J.T., Kimppa K.K. & Mäkilä T. 2018. Virtual to Virtuous Money: A Virtue Ethics Perspective on Video Game Business Logic. J Bus Ethics, 153(1), 95–103.

International Organization for Standardization, 2018. ISO 26000 - Social responsibility.
https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html

Juujärvi, S. 2018 Practical problem solving in enhancing ethical competences of health and social care professionals. In: Sanna Juvonen & Päivi Marjanen & Tarja Meristö (eds.) Learning by Developing 2.0: Case studies in theory and practice. Laurea Publications 101. Laurea University of Applied Sciences, 178–196. https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/159833

Rhodes, C. 2012. Agonism and Possibilities of Ethics in HRT. J Bus Ethics, 111, 49-59.

Saxén H. 2017. A Cultural Giant. An interpretation of bioethics in lights of its intellectual and cultural history. http://tampub.uta.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/101926/978-952-03-0523-9.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Simola S.K., Barling J. & Turner N. 2010. Transformational leadership and leader moral orientation: Contrasting an ethic of justice and ethic of care. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 179-188.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/weber/

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2012. https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/iea/partnerships/about-the-partnership-center/index.html Accessed 6th February 2018.

World Health Organisation. 2011. Standards and Operational Guidance for Ethics Review of Health-Related Research with Human Participants. Accessed 31st March 2017. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44783/1/9789241502948_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1

World Medical Organization. Declaration of Helsinki.1996. British Medical Journal 313(7070):1448-1449. http://www.bmj.com/content/313/7070/1448.2

More relevant articles according to students interest.
Some more suggestions as relevant articles coming later from the speakers.

Toteutuksen valinnaiset suoritustavat

None

Työelämäyhteistyö ja/tai TKI

No

Toteutuksen tärkeät päivämäärät

Deadline of the Pre-assignment 1: research table. 18th October 2019.

Deadline for learning diary: 2019 November 24th 23:59.

Kansainvälisyys toteutuksella

International lecturers:
Joke Lemiengre, PhD, RN, University College Leuven Limburg, Belgium
Lecture xx from Universitetet Nord, Bodö, Norway

Opiskelijan ajankäyttö ja kuormitus

Ethical Leadership and Management -Symposium (5 ECTS = 135 hrs):
Assignment 1 (2 ECTS= 54 hrs) Pre-symposium research table of research articles about ethical leadership and management introduced by responsible teachers in the Optima work space and selected by the students according to their professional interests.
Assignment 2 (0,3 ECTS = 8 hrs) Participation in Symposium
Assignment 3 (2,7 ECTS= 73 hrs) Learning diary including pre-symposium research table and reflection of active participation in Symposium lectures and workshops.

Lisätietoja opiskelijoille

Learning Diary Instructions by PhD Päivi Pöyry-Lassila, Laurea UAS 2017:

What is a learning diary?
A learning diary is a text, written by a student, introducing the reader to the main arguments and other important points of the symposium (or other learning event) through the student’s own remarks and interpretations. In other words, a learning diary reflects the student’s own learning and thinking processes. The learning diary is a result of a "dialogue" between the student as an active thinking subject and the new information encountered and processed during the symposium. The student should relate the new information to the pre-existing knowledge and experiences as well as make connections between issues, relating things to each other and assimilate them into a broader understanding of the symposium’s topics.

What is a good learning diary made of?
A good learning diary cannot be composed only on the basis of the symposium materials and your own raw lecture notes. These are just the starting ingredients and raw materials – to successfully turn them into a good learning diary, you must seek out and present the main points and questions of the symposium that were of particular interest to you, and contextualize them. A learning diary can be understood as something that is a more free-form written assignment than an ordinary essay. In a learning diary, you can more freely choose what to focus on, and can build it up from your own interests – as long as you remember to justify and contextualize your choices!

In addition to your own notes, utilize the lecture materials, pre-reading articles, and the workshop materials when writing the learning diary. You should also take into account what can be drawn from "general knowledge", such as popular opinion, general assumptions and mainstream interpretations. In a good learning diary, you are invited to challenge the “everyday thinking” with arguments derived from academic texts and your own thought process.

Why a learning diary?
When writing a learning diary, you can reflect your own process of absorbing and measuring information from a given course, and thus become more conscious of your process of learning. From your learning diary, the teacher will be able to see not only how the factual contents of a course have been understood by you, but also to see examples of what you have judged to be the most thought-provoking and/or important content of that course. In pedagogic terms, you are given the opportunity to closely examine some of the facts presented, to draw conclusions, and to develop your reasoning.

Practical guidelines and tips for preparing a learning diary
1) Read the pre-reading articles and other materials in advance, before the symposium. During the symposium, you should focus on writing notes and remarks about issues that provoke your thoughts – you can always check most of the facts later.

2) Start writing the learning diary early. At least try to prepare for it by writing down notes already during the symposium.

3) Define your topic: what is a question related to the symposium that interests you most. As a rule of thumb, the narrower the topic, the more additional reading you need to do for your learning diary. Make connections to what you already know, and use articles and other sources as references.

4) Come up with a descriptive title for your learning diary, other than e.g. just a generic "Course name: Learning diary" (or equivalent). The title should reflect those argument(s) and/or conclusion(s) of your text that you judge are the most important and interesting.

5) Try to include subtitles/headings in your text and be sure to include an introduction chapter and a conclusions chapter. If you find it very hard to write the introduction and conclusions, that usually is an indication of a need to work your thoughts a bit further.

6) Use references in your text. Create an accurate list of references/other sources at the end of the document. Also create a research table summarizing the articles related to your text, see example Table 1 below! Create one table for each workshop attended (and related article).

7) Always make sure that your original thought and your own arguments are included in a learning diary. If the text is composed almost completely of references and/or summaries, you can expect to have a low grade or even to fail your assignment.

8) Please pay attention to technical requirements: The paper size should always be A4, the font size is 12pt, the font Times New Roman or other easy-to-read, standard-size font, and line spacing is 1.5 (not 2.0, for example!). Please use standard margins. The minimum length of an assignment means the minimum length of the text itself, including title, subtitles and possible footnotes BUT excluding a possible separate title page (the title can also be written at the top of the first page), and the list of references/sources. Targeted length of the diary is 5-15 content pages. NB: The content of the diary is more important than the length!

Dead Line of the learning diary is 11th November 2019. Return the diary via email to Optima return box.

Arviointiasteikko

H-5

Arviointimenetelmät ja arvioinnin perusteet

Overall assessment criteria for the learning diary
1. Logic, thoroughness, creativity and motivation of the arguments and ideas presented in the reflection
2. Carefulness of using the pre-assignment articles
3. Comprehensiveness of the theoretical foundation
4. Clarity of the report (the structure of the learning diary may be freely determined by the student)

Hylätty (0)

The student did not particepated in the studies or failed to fulfil the EQF 7-level assessment criteria.

Arviointikriteerit, tyydyttävä (1-2)

The student is able
To gather, process, produce and evaluate information about ethical leadership and management widely.
To use concepts of the area of expertise systematically.
To solve problems in ethical leadership and management research, development and/or innovation activities.
To recognize and analyze foci of ethical leadership and management development making use of the knowledge base.
To communicate about ethical leadership and management clearly both orally and in writing.

Arviointikriteerit, hyvä (3-4)

The student is able
To gather, process, produce and evaluate information about ethical leadership and management critically and widely making use of both national and international scientific sources.
To use concepts of the area of expertise fairly.
To solve problems in ethical leadership and management research, development and/or innovation activities by applying and combining information from different fields.
To create target-oriented, justified development plans for ethical leadership and management considering the community.
To communicate about ethical leadership and management in a competent, clear and consistent manner both orally and in writing.

Arviointikriteerit, kiitettävä (5)

The student is able to create a consistent framework/knowledge base for ethical leadership and management making use of both national and international scientific sources in a critical analytic fashion.
To solve demanding problems in research, development and/or innovation activities in ethical leadership and managements where new knowledge and competence is created
as well as to apply and combine information from different fields.
To develop the activities of the ethical leadership and management competence area in a target-oriented and communal fashion.
To communicate about ethical leadership and management convincingly both orally and in writing to audiences within and exterior to the field.