Study Guide

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field specific tasks
- speak and write English with the understanding of the appropriate style and register
- identify personal developmental needs in communication and language skills and develop realistic strategies for improvement
- search for information from professional publications and databases

Teaching methods

Zoom meetings and self-study
Senior lecturer, M.A. Mirja Villman
mirja.villman@laurea.fi

Location and time

Zoom meetings on weeks 10-16, 19-20

Learning materials and recommended literature

For the exam:
- textbook Way to welfare, material specified in Canvas modules
- the teacher´s own material in Canvas and during Zoom meetings.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

If/when recognition of previous studies: written and oral exam, possibly an additional written assignment

Co-operation with working life and/or RDI

-

Important dates

According to the timetable in Pakki/Tuudo
- info on Tue 9 Mar at 9.00-10.00 Zoom
- oral presentations on week 20 in Zoom or as a video handed in by Mon 17 May
- translation of a field-specific article, submit to Canvas by Mon 24 May by 23.59
- exam: SSG221KA on contact day on Tue 18 May at 10.00-12.00 in big auditorium, SSD221KA online (?) on Thu 20 May at 17.00-19.00 or during the contact day in the autumn term, or in another school/institute/UAS on their re-exam dates (normally a fee charged)

Forms of internationality

English-speaking world and culture

Students workload

Equals 5 credits of student´s work

Content and scheduling

Intensively according to the timetable
- Zoom meetings
- oral presentation
- written assignments
- tentti

Further information for students

-

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Written exam and oral presentation fail-5, assignments pass/fail
National evaluation criteria used, see Link>opintojen kulku>kieli- ja viestintäopinnot, eng taitotaso puhuminen/kirjoittaminen

Evaluation criteria, approved/failed

Fails to produce English even on a minimum level of acceptance

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Failing to produce field-specific vocabulary and grammatical constructions

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Knows about the basic vocabulary of the field and can use it, a lot of problems in the use of grammatical constructions

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Can produce field-specific vocabulary and grammar works fairly well, but lapses and errors occur

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Shows good mastery of field-specific terminology and can use even more demanding grammatical constructions