Emergency Preparedness (5 cr)
Code: A9423-3003
General information
Enrollment
13.05.2019 - 26.05.2019
Timing
19.08.2019 - 31.12.2019
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual proportion
5 op
RDI proportion
3 op
Mode of delivery
Distance learning
Unit
Laurea university of applied sciences
Campus
Laurea common
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Turvallisuuden ja riskienhallinnan koulutus (HTA2), Laurea Leppävaara (Finnish)
Teachers
- Ilona Frisk
- Hanna Iisakkila Rojas
- Jaakko Porokuokka
Teacher in charge
Ilona Frisk
Scheduling groups
- Pienryhmä 1 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 2 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 3 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 4 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 5 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 6 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 7 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 8 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 9 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 10 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 11 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
- Pienryhmä 12 (Size: 4. Open UAS: 0.)
Groups
-
HTA219KA
Small groups
Learning outcomes
The student is able to:
- apply the legislation and the most common instructions and requirements on emergency preparedness according to the operations of organisations
- use various risk assessment methods in identifying and assessing accident risks
- create and introduce emergency plans and related documents and plans that support the core aims and the different organisational levels of a company
- monitor and assess the level of emergency preparedness in the organisation and develop it
Teaching methods
On-line, development task with a client.
Learning materials and recommended literature
Listed in Optima.
Students workload
135h
Grading scale
H-5
Evaluation criteria, fail (0)
Study unit will be graded as failed if not all of the tasks are done, any of them is failed and if the criteria for grade 1 is not reached.
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
The student is able to
– use essential professional concepts when explaining various work practices and situations
– search for information in different sources
– report
– work under guidance using the skills and methods learned
– interact with customers and/or co-operation partners
– receive guidance
– work as a member of a team
– plan the progress of his/her work and use of time under guidance
– work safely and in accordance with the professional code of conduct
– follow the provided instructions and rules
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
The student is able to
– use professional concepts in a consistent manner when explaining various work practices and situations
– gather information and use his/her knowledge basis
–report in the agreed manner
– work using the skills and methods learned
– engage in professional interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and identify their needs
– take part in guidance and utilise it
– engage in goal-oriented work in a team
– plan and manage the progress of his/her work and use of time
– detect safety-related risks
– justify this/her actions in accordance with the professional code of conduct
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
The student is able to
– use professional concepts extensively
– compare and choose relevant information
– report and communicate in a professional manner
– work independently, using the skills and methods learned
– take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for responding to their needs
– anticipate his/her need for guidance
– promote the team’s work and team spirit
– manage his/her time appropriately, completing the agreed tasks at the required quality level
– work responsibly, applying the skills and methods learned
– plan and evaluate their work, taking safety and/or ethical aspects into consideration