Skip to main content

English in Social Services (5 cr)

Code: R0032-3043

General information


Enrollment

23.05.2022 - 29.05.2022

Timing

01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022

Number of ECTS credits allocated

5 op

Virtual proportion

5 op

Mode of delivery

Distance learning

Unit

Laurea Otaniemi, sote

Campus

Laurea Otaniemi

Teaching languages

  • Finnish

Seats

20 - 40

Degree programmes

  • Sosionomikoulutus (SSG2), Laurea Otaniemi (Finnish)

Teachers

  • Mirja Villman

Teacher in charge

Mirja Villman

Groups

  • SSG222SA
    Sosionomikoulutus, monimuotototeutus, S22, Otaniemi

Learning outcomes

The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field specific tasks
- speak and write English with the understanding of the appropriate style and register
- identify personal developmental needs in communication and language skills and develop realistic strategies for improvement
- search for information from professional publications and databases

Teaching methods

Zoom meetings and self-study

https://laurea.zoom.us/j/539343904
passcode: 086435

M.A., senior lecturer Mirja Villman
mirja.villman@laurea.fi

Location and time

Zoom meetings on weeks 39-49 according to the timetable

Learning materials and recommended literature

Material on Canvas site and textbook Way to welfare

Alternative completion methods of implementation

If/when recognition of previous studies: written and oral exam, possibly an additional written assignment

Co-operation with working life and/or RDI

-

Important dates

According to the timetable:

- info on Mon 26 Sep at 13.15-14.15
- oral presentation: by Sun 11 Dec
- exam: Mon 12 Dec at 15.30-17.30 on campus and online
- written assignment: by Sun 18 Dec

Forms of internationality

English-speaking world and culture

Students workload

Equals 5 credits of student´s work

Content and scheduling

Intensively according to the timetable on weeks 39-50

Further information for students

-

Grading scale

H-5

Evaluation methods and criteria

Written exam, oral presentation and written assignment

Evaluation criteria, approved/failed

Fails to produce English even on a minimum level of acceptance

Evaluation criteria, fail (0)

Failing to produce field-specific vocabulary and grammatical constructions

Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)

Knows about the basic vocabulary of the field and can use it, a lot of problems in the use of grammatical constructions

Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)

Can produce field-specific vocabulary and grammar works fairly well, but lapses and errors occur

Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)

Shows good mastery of field-specific terminology and can use even more demanding grammatical constructions