English in Social Services (5 cr)
Code: R0032-3043
General information
Enrollment
23.05.2022 - 29.05.2022
Timing
01.08.2022 - 31.12.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual proportion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Distance learning
Unit
Laurea Otaniemi, sote
Campus
Laurea Otaniemi
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
20 - 40
Degree programmes
- Sosionomikoulutus (SSG2), Laurea Otaniemi (Finnish)
Teachers
- Mirja Villman
Teacher in charge
Mirja Villman
Groups
-
SSG222SASosionomikoulutus, monimuotototeutus, S22, Otaniemi
Learning outcomes
The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field specific tasks
- speak and write English with the understanding of the appropriate style and register
- identify personal developmental needs in communication and language skills and develop realistic strategies for improvement
- search for information from professional publications and databases
Teaching methods
Zoom meetings and self-study
https://laurea.zoom.us/j/539343904
passcode: 086435
M.A., senior lecturer Mirja Villman
mirja.villman@laurea.fi
Location and time
Zoom meetings on weeks 39-49 according to the timetable
Learning materials and recommended literature
Material on Canvas site and textbook Way to welfare
Alternative completion methods of implementation
If/when recognition of previous studies: written and oral exam, possibly an additional written assignment
Co-operation with working life and/or RDI
-
Important dates
According to the timetable:
- info on Mon 26 Sep at 13.15-14.15
- oral presentation: by Sun 11 Dec
- exam: Mon 12 Dec at 15.30-17.30 on campus and online
- written assignment: by Sun 18 Dec
Forms of internationality
English-speaking world and culture
Students workload
Equals 5 credits of student´s work
Content and scheduling
Intensively according to the timetable on weeks 39-50
Further information for students
-
Grading scale
H-5
Evaluation methods and criteria
Written exam, oral presentation and written assignment
Evaluation criteria, approved/failed
Fails to produce English even on a minimum level of acceptance
Evaluation criteria, fail (0)
Failing to produce field-specific vocabulary and grammatical constructions
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Knows about the basic vocabulary of the field and can use it, a lot of problems in the use of grammatical constructions
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Can produce field-specific vocabulary and grammar works fairly well, but lapses and errors occur
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Shows good mastery of field-specific terminology and can use even more demanding grammatical constructions