English in Social Services (5 cr)
Code: R0032-3039
General information
Enrollment
29.11.2021 - 05.12.2021
Timing
01.01.2022 - 31.07.2022
Number of ECTS credits allocated
5 op
Virtual proportion
5 op
Mode of delivery
Distance learning
Unit
Laurea Porvoo, sote
Campus
Laurea Virtual Campus
Teaching languages
- Finnish
Seats
40 - 60
Degree programmes
- Sosionomikoulutus (SSP2), Laurea Porvoo (Finnish)
Teachers
- Mirja Villman
Teacher in charge
Mirja Villman
Groups
-
SSP222KASosionomikoulutus, monimuotototeutus, K22, Porvoo
Learning outcomes
The student is able to
- communicate as a professional in field specific tasks
- speak and write English with the understanding of the appropriate style and register
- identify personal developmental needs in communication and language skills and develop realistic strategies for improvement
- search for information from professional publications and databases
Teaching methods
Zoom meetings and self-study
Teacher: Senior lecturer, M.A. Mirja Villman
mirja.villman@laurea.fi
Location and time
On weeks 9-20 online
Learning materials and recommended literature
Textbook Way to welfare and teacher´s own material
Alternative completion methods of implementation
If/when recognition of previous studies: written and oral exam, possibly an additional written assignment
Co-operation with working life and/or RDI
-
Important dates
Zoom meetings according to the timetable:
- info session on Tue 1 March at 9.00-10.00, Zoom: https://laurea.zoom.us/j/539343904, passcode 086435
- exam: Tue 17 May at 16.00-18.00 Canvas/Proctorio/campus
- oral presentation: Sun 15 May by 23.59 on video to Canvas site
- written assignment: Sun 25 May by 23.59 to Canvas site
Forms of internationality
English-speaking world and culture
Students workload
Equals 5 credits of student´s work
Content and scheduling
Intensively according to the timetable
Further information for students
-
Grading scale
H-5
Evaluation methods and criteria
Written exam (fail-5), oral presentation (fail-5) and written assignment (pass/fail)
Evaluation criteria, approved/failed
Fails to produce English even on a minimum level of acceptance
Evaluation criteria, fail (0)
Failing to produce field-specific vocabulary and grammatical constructions
Evaluation criteria, satisfactory (1-2)
Knows about the basic vocabulary of the field and can use it, a lot of problems in the use of grammatical constructions
Evaluation criteria, good (3-4)
Can produce field-specific vocabulary and grammar works fairly well, but lapses and errors occur
Evaluation criteria, excellent (5)
Shows good mastery of field-specific terminology and can use even more demanding grammatical constructions