Skip to main content

Creating Business Negotiation Scenarios in VR/AR (15 cr)

Code: SB00BK92-3007

General information


Enrollment

29.11.2021 - 05.12.2021

Timing

01.01.2022 - 31.07.2022

Number of ECTS credits allocated

15 op

Virtual proportion

8 op

RDI proportion

15 op

Mode of delivery

47 % Contact teaching, 53 % Distance learning

Unit

Laurea Hyvinkää, liko

Campus

Laurea Hyvinkää

Teaching languages

  • English

Seats

7 - 7

Degree programmes

  • Liiketalouden koulutus (HLB2), Laurea Hyvinkää (Finnish)

Teachers

  • Pyry Airaksinen
  • Aapo Hollanti

Teacher in charge

Aapo Hollanti

Groups

  • HLBW
    Kansainvälinen vaihto / Liiketalous, Hyvinkää
  • HLBV21SN
    Liiketalouden ydinosaamisen P2P-projektit

Teaching methods

The goal of the project is to create twp VR scenario on negotiation trade agreement and on negotiation financial agreement. The scenarios will be specific to a certain culture, which will be announced later. The scenarios will be researched by students and created by students using a 3D Bear VR Design tool. Training for the tool will be arranged by 3D bear. The project deals with sustainable financing and business, business strategy and SME companies Export operations. Project will use service design and co-creation methods and mindset.
The project is completed in cooperation with: EU-funded project VIVA - Virtual technologies AR/VR boost SME Exports. Virtual Reality partner 3DBear Oy. Helsinki Uusimaa Regional Council. Case Client to be named an SME by VIVA-project.
Key competences: Sustainability, Creating Scenarios, Virtual and Augmented Realitys, Export, Business Strategy, Service Design and Co-Creation. Project Management


If this project is fully booked, students may use post-enrolment to apply for projects and study units which still accept students.

Service Business Project 11

Project Day is Monday
Pre-Brief at 10th of Jan at 15.40

Laurea reserves the right to make changes.

Location and time

[This field is not used at Laurea.]

Learning materials and recommended literature

The source materials needed for the subject area of the project are selected separately after the project assignment.

Alternative completion methods of implementation

All students are entitled to demonstrate their competence. The recognition and accreditation of prior competence is initiated by the students themselves. The competence is recognised and accredited by the teacher responsible for the studies or another person designated to the position. The assessment is carried out according to the same assessment criteria and, as a rule, same grading scale as that adopted for the corresponding study unit or module. The student is entitled to apply for accreditation of prior competence regardless of where, how and when the competence has been acquired. The student may also seek accreditation of competence to be acquired on the job as part of their degree (work-based learning). ... The student is responsible for demonstrating and verifying their competence and for providing sufficient information.

[Describe the opportunities for accreditation of prior learning or other alternative completion methods.]

Co-operation with working life and/or RDI

Project’s client: [the name of a company or client, or if the company specifically prohibits the release thereof, enter the sector; the field is used to monitor partnerships and the RDI integration.]

Important dates

[Ensure that a kickoff briefing and guidance sessions have been reserved for the project in PEPPI by an education planner, who can factor in the schedules of the students’ other studies in planning. If needed, you may also make the reservation yourself. The student will see the dates in Lukkarikone and, after being accepted to the project, in their Outlook calendar. Therefore, there is no need to enter the dates here. You may specify the reservation details, if needed. If the kickoff briefing is held at the client’s facilities, specify an external location in the reservation.]

Project guidance is offered on a weekly basis. As a student, you may compare the available guidance sessions in Lukkarikone and select those projects/studies that do not overlap. According to the degree regulations (section 18 ) compulsory attendance in a study unit must be specified and justified in the study unit’s implementation plan.

In addition, the project team schedules a separate meeting to work on the project after the kickoff briefing.

Supervisors send a separate briefing invitation to those who were accepted to the project approximately one week before the kickoff briefing.

Forms of internationality

[Describe the realisation of internationality in the project and/or any international partners here. The contents of this data field are used to monitor the implementation methods and the realisation of the strategic objectives. Leave the text if it applies:] The study unit is suitable for exchange students.

Students workload

[Calculate the scope of the project on the basis of the number of credits and the duration of the project (1 cr. = 26.7 h). E.g., a student spends approximately 16 hours of work time on the project; in other words, approximately 8 hrs for team work and approximately 8 hrs for independent work per week.]

Content and scheduling

[Describe the content by using the vocabulary used in the world of work. Eg. if you are teaching the basics of programming, tell also which language you are teaching. From this field you should be able to find same words, which are being used in job postings. The field will be used in a service using AI to match studies, jobs and personal competences.]

Further information for students

The study unit corresponds to the requirements of Bachelor's level education.

According to the degree regulations (section 18) "students must be present for the first contact teaching session, or they must notify the responsible teacher of their absence to confirm they intend to participate in studies, Alternatively, the teacher can specify a different manner for the student to confirm that they intend to participate in the studies. The completion of these measures can be required within a week of the studies having begun. The application of the aforementioned approach requires that the teacher notifies the students accepted to the study unit of the practice and that the practice is specifically mentioned in the study unit’s implementation plan.

If the student has a justified reason for not attending the first contact teaching session or for not notifying the teacher of their intention to be involved in studies in the manner required by the teacher, the student must contact the responsible teacher to agree on participation in the studies. Their registration for the study unit will be rejected, of the student does not notify the teacher of being absent from the first contact teaching session or the reason for their absence cannot be considered justified, Another student who is in line for the study unit can be selected in their place."

[If there are quata for certain type of students, open UAS, 3AMK etc please tell about the quota and the amount of study places reserved for those students in this field. If needed, you can also specify the target group the complementary competence study is primarily aimed at, if the target group is to be prioritised when students are accepted on the implementation.]

The quality of the study unit implementation has been assessed and the self-evaluation report is available in [Optima, Canvas, Teams, or elsewhere; you can also add OneDrive link].

Evaluation methods and criteria

“The evaluation of competence is based on the descriptions of objectives in the curricula, and the level of competence is assessed according to the evaluation criteria listed in the implementation plan for the studies.” (Laurea degree regulations).

Evaluation is discussed at the beginning of the project.

You can remove criteria that are not suitable for this implementation but no other changes are not allowed.]

In this study unit the assessing of the competences will be done by using the criteria set for requirement level II.

PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE BASIS, INFORMATION SEARCHING AND REPORTING

To achieve grade 5 student must be able to
- analyse the acquired information, draw conclusions and combine theoretical knowledge with experiential knowledge

To achieve grade 3 student must be able to
- critically evaluate information and justify their actions with science-based knowledge

To achieve grade 1 (or pass) student must be able to
- use professional concepts in a consistent manner and demonstrate his/her familiarity with the knowledge basis
- report and communicate in a professional manner

PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE AND WORKPLACE DEVELOPMENT

To achieve grade 5 student must be able to
- evaluate the applicability of produced knowledge, skill or idea to other contexts as well as their impact
- anticipate needs of customers and/or co-operation partners

To achieve grade 3 student must be able to
- propose creative solutions at work
- promote professional co-operation and enhance customer and partner relationships

To achieve grade 1 (or pass) student must be able to
- act independently taking into account the operating environment
- take responsibility for interaction with customers and/or co-operation partners and for responding to their needs

TEAMWORK SKILLS, LEADERSHIP AND RESPONSIBILITY

To achieve grade 5 student must be able to
- evaluate and develop the team’s entrepreneurial and responsible approach to work
- evaluate the possibilities for utilising competence and plan his/her personal development and development of the team

To achieve grade 3 student must be able to
- act in a manner that promotes the team’s entrepreneurial and responsible approach to work
- describe the development of his/her competence in relation to the learning outcomes

To achieve grade 1 (or pass) student must be able to
- describe the significance of his/her actions for successful co-operation
- describe his/her competence in relation to the learning outcomes

"Students who has failed to demonstrate their competence in accordance with the approved level must supplement or retake their study attainment in a manner and schedule defined by the teacher of the study unit. In project studies, students must supplement the competence missing from the project’s learning outcomes, until their competence can be evaluated as passing." (Degree regulations.)